Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0360220150560121906
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2015 Volume.56 No. 12 p.1906 ~ p.1912
Comparison of Ocular Pulse Amplitude Measured Using Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Ocular Blood Flow Analyzer
±è¿ëÇö:Kim Yong-Hyun
À̸¶ºó:Lee Mar-Vin/¾ÈÀçÈ«:Ahn Jae-Hong
Abstract
Purpose: To compare ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measured using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and ocular blood flow analyzer (BFA).

Methods: Thirty-five eyes of 35 patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional and retrospective study. OPA was measured using DCT. Pulse amplitude (PA) and pulsatile ocular blood flow were measured using BFA.

Results: OPA measured using DCT (2.79 ¡¾ 0.89 mm Hg) was not significantly different from PA measured with BFA (3.02 ¡¾ 0.90 mm Hg; p = 0.082) and both were significantly correlated (r = 0.663, p < 0.001). Mean difference ¡¾ limit of agreement was -0.22 ¡¾ 1.44 mm Hg between OPA and PA. OPA correlated significantly with intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (r = 0.330, p = 0.047) but not PA (r = 0.057, p = 0.745). Both PA and OPA did not show significant correlation with the spherical equivalent of refractive error and central corneal thickness.

Conclusions: Although both OPA and PA measure IOP fluctuation and are not significantly different, they showed different relationships with IOP.
KEYWORD
Intraocular pressure, Ocular blood flow, Ocular pulse amplitude
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø